famiLEE LEEgime court violated law & constitution and then slapped itself

Today's Yahoo Taiwan News for comparison！
URL1
URL2

In almost every single one of the trials which the famiLEE LEEgime abused to Fix The Opposition, it persistently violated and neglected the constitution.

In such trials just involving myself, it already happened for about 5 times.

That included the 8 cases of General Election 2006 speeches, consisting of 2 part-heard cases and 4 un-heard cases.

This aspect became the most obvious on Thursday, 30 October 2008 at court 5, where I face Tak Boleh Tahan protest charges together with the TBT18.

It had been a constant style that famiLEE LEEgime's court make such kind of rulings in our cases:

1. Subordinate Court have no power to handle constitutional issues.
2. This is not a Judiciary Review, take your grievances to one.
   
3. Defense on Constitutional Ground can not be accepted in this trial.
   
4. Educing any evidence to prove Constitutional Violation is Irrelevant and Not Permitted.
   

On October 30 2008 Thursday, they went so far in court 5 for the TBT trial that after Dr CSJ read out this Subordinate Courts Act Section 56A and made application under that particular section for the cases to be transmitted to High Court according to this law:

Reference of constitutional question to High Court
56A. —(1) Where in any proceedings in a subordinate court a question arises as to the interpretation or effect of any provision of the Constitution, the court hearing the proceedings may stay the proceedings on such terms as may be just to await the decision of the question on the reference to the High Court.
[15/93]
(2) An order staying proceedings under this section may be m
ade by the court of its own motion or on the application of any party and shall be made at such stage of the proceedings as the court may see fit having regard to the decision of such questions of fact as may be necessary to be settled to assist the High Court in deciding the question which has arisen and to the speedy and economical final determination of the proceedings.
[15/93]
(3) Where an order for stay of proceedings has been made under this section, the court shall state the question which in its opinion has arisen as to the interpretation or effect of the Constitution in the form of a special case which so far as may be possible shall state the question in a form which shall permit of an answer being given in the affirmative or the negative.
[15/93]
(4) The court shall cause the special case to be transmitted to the High Court and the High Court shall hear and determine the constitutional question arising out of the case in the exercise of its original jurisdiction.
[15/93]
(5) Notice of the hearing of the special case by the High Court under this section shall be given to the Attorney-General who shall have a right to be heard.
[15/93]

Still the District Judge Chia Wei Kiat ruled against that application, saying that he is still not inclined to transmit these cases to High Court for constitutional arguments from ALL the accused persons and their councils to be heard!

To make it the most ironical, there are lots of exhibits in the main hall of that famiLEE LEEgime Subordinate Court including one "TOOLS OF LAW" showing statutes and constitution. On a huge picture of taken at the interior of the old parliament house, it printed in huge fonts this introduction of the constitution:

THE CONSTITUTION
The Constitution came into force on 9 August 1965, the day of Singapore's independence from Malaysia. The Constitution is the supreme law of Singapore. Any law that conflicts with the Constituion is void and Singapore courts can strike down any legislative or executive Acts that go against the Constitution....

So this is how the corrupted and incompetent famiLEE LEEgime made audacious violation of constitution and rules of law, and then slapped itself in the face.

Strangely, I just came across a piece of news from Yahoo Taiwan, that reported how their judge had struck down an unconstitutional legislation regarding massage services that allowed only visually disabled persons (usually blinds) to work in massage services, that this is found to be in violation of constitutional equality:

視障才能做按摩 大法官說違憲
聯合 更新日期:2008/11/01 07:20 記者王文玲／台北報導

司法院大法官昨天作成解釋，宣告身心障礙者權益保障法明定按摩業專由視障者從事的法條，因違反憲法平等權及工作權而違憲。

依大法官第六四九號解釋，盲人近卅年來獨占按摩業的情形將被打破，明眼人最遲三年後即可合法從事按摩業。

大法官宣告身心障礙者權益保障法第四十六條第一項前段規定違憲，自解釋公布起最遲三年後失效，這也是歷來解釋所定的最長時間；以讓主管機關為視障者做好縝密的規畫執行，促進視障者的多元就業，並將按摩業的管理導入正軌。

解釋指出，禁止非視障者從事按摩業始於民國六十九年的殘障福利法，但隨著社會發展，按摩就業和消費市場擴大，盲人專事按摩業的規定對其他人造成過度限制，違反憲法平等權及工作權。

因為按摩的範圍不明確，執行標準不一，坊間的腳底按摩、推拿塑身、護膚美容、健康會館或理髮店等行業，只要營業中有明眼人按摩，都可能被處罰；使得有意投身按摩業的明眼人須轉行或失業，對消費者也不公平。

大法官雖宣告有關規定違憲，但強調應保障視障者的工作權，主管機關應致力提升其社經地位，加強工作能力，促成視障者和非視障者的雙贏。

【記者李順德／台北報導】大法官釋憲宣告「不讓明眼人按摩」違憲，內政部長廖了以第一時間對這項釋憲有點錯愕，隨後說，既然大法官釋憲已有定論，內政部為減緩衝擊，將協調勞委會開辦職訓及就業服務，增加視障者就業媒合機會，並於三年期限內完成相關配套措施及修法工作。

被媒體詢及此一釋憲結果，廖了以說，社會福利概念原本就是要保障弱勢，幫助視障者，不能說成要與明眼人搶工作。內政部說，多年來幫助視障者增加就業管道，讓按摩成為視障者重要謀生技能，粗估目前從事按摩業的視障者，占所有視障就業人口三分之一強。

【記者曾懿晴／台北報導】「請政府對視障者的生存權負起責任！」殘障聯盟秘書長王幼玲表示，視障朋友因在就業市場上處於劣勢，當初才立法保障他們的按摩工作機會。「面對大法官的釋文，我們深感遺憾。」

Sammyboy.Com 论坛发布

famiLEE's political masturbation - any more?

How would one fillip a piece of Pee Sai (nose mucus)?

famiLEE's political masturbation news

Can you do anything better than that old dog thief Lee Kuan Yew?

Do you think you can continue to count on such political masturbation to sustain your rotten famiLEE LEEgime any further? Do you know how people would fillip a piece of Pee Sai? Watch my video! :-)

Sammyboy.Com thread

Greed: Lehman Bro; NKF & famiLEE LEEgime's CEO minsiters

Bush might be the poorest bastard among these greedy faces in terms of salaries:

Ask yourself what are the differences between famiLEE LEEgime's CEO ministers & NKF's TT Durai & Lehman Brother's Richard Fuld? Aren't they all CEOs of the world's highest salaries?

NKF is just a charity implementation of famiLEE LEEgime's CEO minister culture & other LEEgalized Corruption systems. Lehman Brother's type of syndicates of greed is exactly what they are modeled after.

Greedy Selfish Ruthless Exploiters they are.

They control huge funds and used that as their false justifications for highest salaries and then defended their own greed with all the same theories.

TT Durai exploited NKF charity donations while his NKF patients are neglected and suffering. Richard Fuld exploited Lehman Brother's investors' funds and enriched himself ruthlessly as he vaporised his victims' funds. LKy's famiLEE LEEgime is the worst of all, in that they manipulate entire parliament and made laws to LEEgalize their own corruptions and draw salaries more than 5 times of Bush's and enslave entire nation's peasants for life-long exploitations.

Bush vaporized all the remaining strengths of superpower USA while his family & cronies of Texas oil merchants including Cheney enriched themselves.

Sammyboy.Com Thread
ABC News Richard Fuld salary & bonus article

Lehman Brothers Boss Defends $484 Million in Salary, Bonus

Richard Fuld Becomes Poster Boy for Wall Street Greed at Heated Congressional Hearing

By BRIAN ROSS and ALICE GOMSTYN
October 6, 2008

In the first Congressional hearing into the financial crisis, the former CEO of the bankrupt Lehman Brothers, Richard Fuld, became the poster boy for Wall Street greed today as he defended the $484 million he received in salary, bonuses and stock options since 2000.

"Is that fair?" asked committee chairman Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) who pointed out Fuld owns a mansion in Greenwich, Connecticut, an ocean front estate on Jupiter Island, Florida, a ski chalet in Idaho and a Manhattan apartment.

"If you haven't discovered your role, you're the villain today," said Rep. John Mica (R-FL).

Fuld said given the collapse of Lehman Brothers and its now worthless stock, his actual holdings were closer to $350 million.

"That's still a lot of money," he told the hearing.

Fuld said he took "full responsibility" for the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and "felt horrible" about it.

But Fuld said he has yet to understand why the federal government helped to bail out the AIG insurance company and other investment banking firms, but did not do so a few days earlier to save Lehman Brothers.

"Until the day they put me in the ground, I will wonder," Fuld told the Congressional panel, seeming to seethe with anger.

"This is a pain that will stay with me the rest of my life."

In his opening remarks, Waxman lambasted both Fuld and Lehman.

Internal documents obtained by the committee, Waxman said, "portray a company in which there was no accountability for failure."

Waxman cited an e-mail exchange among top Lehman executives. After someone sent an e-mail suggesting that Lehman's top management give up their bonuses, both Fuld and George H. Walker, a member of Lehman's executive committee and a cousin of President Bush, sent e-mails disagreeing with the suggestion.

Walker, according to Waxman, replied by writing, "Sorry team. I'm not sure what's in the water at 605 Third Avenue today. … I'm embarrassed and I apologize."

Waxman said that Fuld "mocked" the suggestion by adding, "Don't worry – they are only people who think about their own pockets."

Waxman also cited a request submitted to Lehman's compensation committee four days before the firm filed for bankruptcy. The request, he said, recommended that the board give three departing executives over $20 million in "special payments."

"In other words, even as Mr. Fuld was pleading with Secretary Paulson for a federal rescue, Lehman continued to squander millions on executive compensation," Waxman said.

Richard Fuld Testifies Before Congress

Despite warnings that "liquidity can disappear quite fast," Fuld "depleted Lehman's capital reserves by over $10 billion through year-end bonuses, stock buybacks, and dividend payments," Waxman said.

Others at the hearing voiced their own concerns about compensation at Lehman.

Nell Minow, the editor of the research firm, The Corporate Library, highlighted Fuld's compensation, which exceeded $70 million last year.

"I think it is fair to say by any standard of measurement that this pay plan is as uncorrelated to performance as it is possible to be," she said.

Minow also found fault with Lehman's corporate board. The Corporate Library grades the performance of corporate boards and last month, Minow said, the firm downgraded Lehman's board to an "F."

"In this case, the board was too old, had served too long, was too out of touch with massive changes in the industry, had too little of their own net worth at risk, and was too compromised for rigorous independent oversight," she said.

Prior to Fuld's testimony, Minow and several other experts testified before the committee on Lehman's bankruptcy and today's financial turmoil.

Dr. Luigi Zingales, a professor of finance at the University of Chicago, said that Lehman's demise was a result of its aggressive use of leverage, or debt to finance investments, "in the context of a major financial crisis."

It made Lehman especially vulnerable to insolvency, Zingales said.

"Lehman did not find itself in that situation by accident; it was the unlucky draw of a consciously-made gamble," he said.

Robert Wescott, the president of the economic analysis and public policy research firm Keybridge Research LLC, said that the root of the financial crisis, overall lay in "easy credit."

Variable rate mortgages with low initial interest rates "gave many families an inflated sense of their capacity to afford housing," Wescott said. As a result, he said, housing prices began rising as high as 30 percent per year and "a housing frenzy developed."

Debate of Mortgage Regulation

"Many Americans developed unrealistic expectations and assumed that housing prices could only go up," he said.

Meanwhile, the securitization of mortgages aggravated the situation – it allowed mortgage originators to make risky loans without concerns about the consequences.

"Since the mortgage originator was no longer going to hold the mortgage to maturity, but rather was going to immediately sell it to a securities firm and collect its fee up front, it did not have a strong incentive to perform due diligence on the loan," Westcott said.

Peter J. Wallison, a fellow in financial policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, said that the lack of regulation of government-sponsored mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac played a major role in the crisis. Congress, he said, resisted reforming the regulation of the two companies "until it was too late."

Wallison also cited a newspaper article that showed "the SEC's failure to devote sufficient resources to the regulation of the major investment banking firms."

Weak regulation, Wallison said, "can be worse than none."

Near the end of the hearing, after some two hours of questioning, Fuld stressed his personal feelings about Lehman's bankruptcy.

"My employees, my shareholders, creditors, clients have taken a huge amount of pain and, again, not that everybody on this committee cares about this, but I wake up every single night thinking what I could I have done differently," he said.

"I have searched myself every single night, and I come back to at the time ... I made those decisions, I made those decisions with the information that I had ... I can look right at you and say this is a pain that will stay with me for the rest of my life, regardless of what comes out of this committee."

Waxman closed the hearing noting that he was dissatisfied with Fuld's testimony.

"You took responsibility for the decisions you made in retrospect, you think you should have done some things different," he said, "but you don't seem to acknowledge that you did anything wrong."

How Much is Left in GIC Temasek this week?

Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew suddenly healed from his nearly 10 days of Oral Constipation today, and he had his big gap shut completely since the passing of Mr. JBJ. After Old Dog Thief's oral diarrhea on Golden Period & expression of false confidence with the US economic strength, just not too long ago, Wall Street gave his dog face a series of loud and clear slapping. I guess that was the cause of Lee Kuan Yew's switching from Oral Diarrhea to nearly 10 days of Oral Constipation, not to mention his recent heart rate issue and hospitalization. He compared his own hospitalization with that of North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il. Kim had recently made public appearance to prove Old Dog Thief's rumor regarding his health wrong. :-)

These are not the real issue in this post.

The issue is Where Is Our Money old dog thief?

How much is left with GIC Temasek after this week? What about next week?

DOW is 8139 as I am writing, FTSE is 4087; Nikke is 8176; STI is 1948.

So how much of our CPF savings are lost? How much to be further lost?

Why are we paying the world's highest salaries for greedy selfish cowards cabinet which now tell us to rely on Indian economy tonight? Shouldn't we employ Indian cabinet for tenth of the LEEgime minister's salaries instead?

Old Dog Thief said Singapore was in the beginning of 10 years of Golden Era to justify the pay rise of his famiLEE LEEgime cabinet. Now they are telling us economic recession / depression and pay-cut and job-cut. What kind of incompetent liar is this?

Where is Our Money now, self-serving crooks?




Sammyboy.Com Thread

GCT & Ass Loong Hypocritical Propagandas

Yahoo News Link:

JBJ's fight with PAP did not affect his sons: PM Lee, SM Goh

Straits Times - 01 Oct 06:38AM

PAP leaders never wanted their fight with Mr J.B. Jeyaretnam to affect his two sons, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong said yesterday.

Suck my toes hypocrites!

This is what Chinese called 猫哭老鼠，假惺惺。

Today there is no inheritance property nor bequest that the 2 sons of late Mr. JBJ could inherit when late Mr. JBJ once had many houses including multi-million dollar banglow and savings in bank. It is doubtless that these assets had been robbed by famiLEE LEEgime bandits LEEgally from Mr. JBJ, where these are the very obvious financial sufferings directly affected by shameless bandit famiLEE LEEgime on the 2 sons of Mr. JBJ.

This is in terms of millions of dollars. Not to mention yet the priceless honor of their late father being abused and trashed by these bandits.

Mr JBJ should hold MP's title while Ass Loong's dad lame bastard old dog thief Lee Kuan Yew & GCt had abused defamation suit to kick him out of the parliament. In the bastards' shameless propaganda they were trying to say that this does not distress and affect Mr. JBJ's sons?

Don't make my toes laugh LEEgime bastards!

Take back your own propagandas and shaft it!

Sammyboy.Com thread

Where PAp is Identical with NKF

Today 8.Oct.2008 I found this on Lian He Zao Bao:I can not find the English version online, I think the 154th is doing a good job hiding this from the public :-) as usual.

The famiLEE LEEgime's so called Peoples' Action Party's brunch treasurer by name of Lee Joo Leong or alike age 43 had been charged for embezzlement of party's funds amounting S$78,000. LEEgime's court set his bail to S$12,000.

Charge said that Lee stole the fund from an account of PAp at DBS on 2.Feb.2007 & 27.Jun.2008 amounting S$50,000 and S$2,8461.46 respectively.

Lee was a manager of bank, and he was not represented by any lawyer. He is liable for 3 years imprisonment or fine or both.

Now is this not an aspect of corruption identical between NKF's TT Durai & PAp?

What was TT Durai charged for?

Sammyboy.Com thread