叶叔问政： famiLEE LEEgime delay Hougang SMC by-Election to cost heavy in GE2016

Youtube URL


1920x1080:
original:

李家王朝拖延宣布后港单选区补选日期。叶叔谈论压制和对应策略。uncleyap spoke on famiLEE LEEgime delaying Hougang SMC by-election schedule, and GE2016 prospects. Recorded 4.Feb.2012

A collection of by-election related video had been recorded and I am editing and organizing them progressively, this is the first of the completed. TeoChew dialect is included along with Chinese & English. ;)

More videos will be prepared and released during the coming weeks. :)

Sammyboy.com Thread

Taiwan's state subsidized political campaigns

Ref News URL

宋林票未達5% 拿不回保證金

中央社 – 2012年1月15日 下午9:00

相關內容

• 放大照片宋林票未達5% 拿不回保證金

（中央社記者蔡和穎台北15日電）大選落幕，親民黨宋林配獲得36萬9588票，未達法定總統副總統選舉經費補貼門檻，登記參選時繳交的新台幣1500萬元保證金，也因得票數不足選舉人總數5%，依法將不予發還。
當選的中國國民黨正副總統候選人馬英九及吳敦義，依得票數初步估算將可獲約2億673萬餘元；民主進步黨候選人蔡英文及蘇嘉全可獲1億8280萬餘元；2組候選人也得領回當初繳交的1500萬元保證金。
中央選舉委員會秘書長鄧天祐今天表示，中選會將在19日召開委員會議，審定第13任總統副總統選舉及第8屆立法委員當選人名單，同時也將公布總統立委選舉候選人及政黨競選費用補貼金額。
總統副總統選舉罷免法規定，各組候選人選舉得票數達當選票數1/3以上者，應補貼其競選費用，每票補貼30元，最高額不得超過中選會公布的正副總統同組候選人競選經費最高金額4億2463萬4000元，政黨推薦候選人補貼費用應由推薦政黨領取。
親民黨總統副總統候選人宋楚瑜及林瑞雄則因得票數未達馬吳配當選票數的1/3，因此依法無法獲得競選經費補貼，也因得票數不足選舉人總數5%，保證金將無法發還。
政黨補助金部分，公職人員選舉罷免法規定，全國不分區及僑居國外國民立法委員選舉政黨得票率達5%以上者，應補貼該政黨競選費用，每年每票補貼50元。
根據中選會公布全國不分區及僑居國外國民選舉結果，國民黨得票率44.5465%，民進黨34.6178%，台聯8.9566%，親民黨5.486%，都跨越政黨補助門檻可獲補貼。
初步估算，國民黨將可獲補助約2.9億餘元，民進黨可獲約2.3億餘元，親民黨可得約3600萬元，台聯黨可獲5900萬元。
區域及原住民立委部分，在現行單一選區制度下，當選人得票數達選舉區當選票數1/3以上者，依法應補貼競選費用，每票補貼30元，最高額不得超過各選舉區候選人競選經費最高金額。1010115（圖為親民黨候選人敗選後向支持者鞠躬，中央社檔案照片）

According to the info above and according to the Taiwanese CEC (Central Electoral Committee - equivalent to Elections Department) briefings I attended years ago as a member of international electoral observation group. The law specified a provision for state to subsidise electoral candidates and parties in their political campaign expenses. For parliamentary election, each candidate who won at least 5% of votes get NT$50 per year for each vote won, to assist the politicians to run their political campaigns.

I had not attended any Taiwanese CEC briefings on Presidential Election, but according to the article above, presidential candidates gets NT$30 per vote won provided their vote is not lower than 33%. There are also equivalent subsidies for other elections such as county magistrates and mayors and city council and even village level elections.

On the exact and strongest contrary the famiLEE LEEgime in Singapore implemented notorious Political Donation Act to kerb opposition politicians from getting a decent campaign funded by their own supporters & electorates. And under the law anything above S$5000 get eaten by that state, and if not declared the candidate will be disqualified for 5 years.

Needless to say, the corrupt selfish and coward famiLEE LEEgime ought to be punished for legislating against the common principal and practise in their wicked schemes to keep themselves in power. This is just an example feature of famiLEE LEEgime rules.

Sammyboy.com discussion thread URL

Uncleyap Prompts famiLEE to Self-Declare Assets

A portion of this video addressed this issue of Lee Kuan Yew famiLEE LEEgime, which I am calling upon to make a self-declaration of family assets. This is the right time to remind them to do so, as Libyan & many other dictators are fallen and Kim Jong Il of North Korea also died this week. As it is LKy is still conscious and able to sell his latest authored books, and he is serious reminded to do so, make this asset declaration before he bite the dust. We would have a reference figure in that case which is his own declaration, considered that his famiLEE reigned the entire Singapore political power since the very beginning of this republic, in the whole of last 50+ years, plus that he persistently claimed to be the World's Cleanest and Un-Corrupted LEEgime.

This is something that LKy ought to answer for himself instead of leaving this to his Sons and famiLEE descendants to answer on his behalf.

Show us that you have NOTHING TO HIDE!



youtube.com URL

Sammyboy.com Thread URL
Related Chinese Blog Post URL

FALSEHOOD Attitute Displayed Again by Loong

Related News URL
Related Blog Post URL

Speaking after a briefing by the Land Transport Authority officials after another breakdown -- this time on Saturday morning -- PM Lee said SMRT had to begin restoring public confidence in its system. 

"What is important is for us now to get to the bottom of the matter and get the system up and running safely again," he was quoted as saying by the paper.

Before even the Public Inquiry had been even organised, famiLEE LEEgime's Loong Son had directed SMRT to Begin Restoring Public Confidence. And he also rejected that it wasn't a Human Safety Issue but a Technical Failure after thousands were stranded in Dark and Poorly Ventilated Tunnels.

Jumping the gun from Inquiry and Rectification so quickly to Restoring Public Confidence clearly displayed the classic famiLEE LEEgime attitude of FALSEHOOD. That is their Value and I relate this Directly to the causes of many Singaporean Failures and Issues. That they are most concerned about Falsely Impressing People inside & outside of Singapore, regardless weather if they really know their problems, or are really capable of solving them. They want problems to be swept under their thickest carpets as soon as possible and resume their Myth-Mongerings to Fool The Public into Baseless Trust & Confidence.

Despite the fact that at least 2 people had been hospitalised after being trapped for more than an hour in harsh and dangerous conditions of Dark & Poorly Ventilated Tunnels, Ass Loong Son denied that is is Human Safety Issue. It reflected together that he is exhibiting the classic famiLEE LEEgime culture of dressing up superficial public impression while neglecting the Real Core crisis faced by the people.

I suggest that Loong should personally visit some of the victims who are voters of his very own Ang Moh Kio GRC, and listen up to their horrible suffering experience during their agonies trapped within MRT Tunnels.

I challenge him to comment on weather this be a safety issue still if his old dog thief father was trapped more than 1 hour in that dark tunnel and then hospitalised. Or just a mere Technical Failure.

Later today, I will try to prepare a video to address related issues from different angles. ;)

Sammyboy.Com Thread URL

Youtube Video URL

Lee Kuan Yew brought insults on himself again interferring with ROC PE

Related Chinese Blog Post URL

Related Yahoo Taiwan News URL

李光耀：宋楚瑜搶走馬英九的票 比蔡英文還多

更新日期:2011/10/09 11:15 編譯張佑生、記者雷光涵／綜合報導

新加坡前內閣資政李光耀表示，他不了解親民黨主席宋楚瑜為何堅持參選總統。李光耀認為宋楚瑜能起的作用就是搶走馬英九的票，比搶走蔡英文的票還要多。
李光耀七日晚間在新加坡第十一屆世界華商大會閉幕晚宴的對話上，對在場的四千名華商發表上述看法。李光耀直言，在兩岸關係上提出「不統、不獨、不武」原則的中國國民黨參選人馬英九，如果連任成功，兩岸關係就可根據近年的路線發展下去，深化雙方的經濟關係，為雙方都帶來好處。
至於民主進步黨參選人蔡英文，李光耀認為，雖然她無法扭轉兩岸關係發展的結局，她會儘量拖慢兩岸聯繫日益緊密的進度，中國大陸購買台灣南部農產品，可能也會慢慢減少。
李光耀說，最令他感到不解的是宋楚瑜。他引述最近台灣的一些民意調查結果說，馬英九和蔡英文競選支持度都在三成以上，而宋楚瑜只有約百分之十五。
李光耀說：「我不明白他為什麼認為本身可以追上另外二人。他所能起到的作用，就是奪去馬英九的選票，比奪走蔡英文的票來得多。」
李光耀認為，雖然中國大陸非常關注台灣的政治發展，但對台灣的總統選舉其實發揮不了多大的影響。他還說，台灣無論是誰當選總統，都難以改變台灣最終將與大陸統一的結局。
對於李光耀的評論，親民黨發言人李桐豪昨天說，「這是他的個人意見，親民黨無從評論。」李桐豪認為這是李光耀對外國政治的觀察，「如同我們也會觀察別國的政治生態，只希望新加坡人不會干涉台灣的內政。」

Taiwanese People First Party responded to Lee Kuan Yew's comments on Taiwanese Presidential Election's 3-corner fight with James Song's participation. The Taiwanese does not wish to see Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew interfering with Taiwanese Domestic Politics, the People First Party told the press.

Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew obediently shut his big mouth in Presidential Election 2011 in which a 4-Corner fight with 4 Tans took place. He shut up because Netizens put him under heavy fire whenever he opened his big mouth. To satisfy his own urge to advise others, now the old dog turned to Taiwanese Presidential Election 2012, and commented that the 3-corner fight is not helping the cause and James Song's participation served no cause.

Jame Song's People First Party had responded by telling old dog Lee Kuan Yew to mind his own business.

:D

Malaysian Head of State Agong served more practical purpose than SG President

In comparison between Singaporean and Malaysian Head of States, today the Malaysian Agong had demonstrated a practical purposed served and fulfilled a crucial national needs - for once at least. For that big political show down between opposition led by Mr. Anwar & BN led by PM Najib.

Agong played a neutral role and brought a more peaceful settlement to the impending major Bersih show down. This is also their election year.

In the comparison this is also SG's Presidential & General Election year, and famiLEE LEEgime only repeatedly stress to the people that Elected President is essentially their puppet and eunuch. Practically useless.

Malaysia Boleh! LEEgime mati!
;)

ABC News URL

King heads off feared Malaysia violence

By Cameron Wilson for Radio Australia

Posted 2 hours 0 minutes ago

Malaysia's king has headed off a potentially violent confrontation of protest groups on the streets of Kuala Lumpur.

An Australian observer, Professor Clive Kessler, told Radio Australia's Connect Asia program the country had "stepped back from the brink" with the royal intervention.

In a rare intervention in politics, sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin called on an electoral reform group, Bersih, to call off a street protest.

Bersih's plans to hold anti-government protests on Saturday had stirred other groups, including the ruling UMNO party, to say that they would hold counter rallies - raising fears of possible riots.

After an audience with the king, Bersih, the Coalition for Free and Fair Election, has decided to hold the weekend march in a stadium, allaying fears of chaos.

Professor Kessler, from the University of NSW, says it was "a remarkable intervention".

"The last two weeks in Malaysia have been astounding and gripping and all one can say is that Malaysia has, at least for the moment, stepped back from the brink," he said from Kuala Lumpur.

He says the calling out of other groups in counter-rallies came after the government refused to sanction the Bersih march.

"The government basically said no and authorised the use of violence by surrogate, by vigilante groups, against the marchers and was pleading in advance self-defence in doing so," he said.

"In other words, blaming the Bersih sympathisers and Bersih for the violence that was to be unleashed upon them, and that was a terrifying prospect."

After complicated negotiations, the Bersih group agreed to meet in a stadium in Shah Alam, the state capital a little outside Kuala Lumpur.

"The march is officially off, but a very large number of people can be expected to attend the [rally] since it's no longer forbidden. It now has royal blessing," Professor Kessler said.

Tags: world-politics, malaysia

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Bilingual article from Sammyboy.Com forum

English URL:

Re: Your money worries and your democratic rights

I urge Singaporeans to learn and be clear about Rights & Ability, or the rather Rights vs Ability.

Confusion between the 2 is very bad.

Rights is a logical matter, Ability is a physical. Difference is big here.

If you are on your death bed, lost 99% of your ability, you will still have 100% of your rights as long as the rest in this world still respect your rights. You would even have your rights as a DEAD MAN totally with zero ability, as long as the others would uphold your rights for you.

If you had your physical Ability to enforce and guard your what is rightfully yours, it is a very different thing, because you don't need to depend on any others to uphold your own Rights, and if any of them violated your Rights, you physically put them to the places they belong.

As activists we help people by inspiring them and encouraging them to acquire their physical Abilities to empower themselves, to guard their own logical rights.

When people's Rights had been violated and compromised / undermined, helplessly, that means they lack the ability to uphold and guard their own Rights, or defending against the violators.

Hence talking about Rights in these cases is just merely Account the amount of losses suffered at the most, if you just merely talk about Rights. By that we know that the violators will only continue to exploit, unless your talks alone can stop them via embarrassment. If that is the case it is too easy, and these lucky people don't really need any activists to do anything.

In most cases, if you really want to Reclaim the losses suffered, you really need quite some Physical Ability, that is whatever form of Damages, Pressure, Pain, Losses, Distress, Hurt, Death etc you can cause to the violators to defend your violated Rights.

Talks are cheap. And most likely not very helpful.

Because in the 1st place the violators did not accidentally violated people rights, they calculated and prepared and intentionally / purposefully did it.



They neglected and disrespected and violated the people's right for their own gains, in most cases.

If Singaporeans had absolutely no Ability to inflict something wonderful on the LEEgime, you think Ass Loong Son will apologize like he did in GE2011. You really think so?


I strongly believe otherwise.

uy..

中文链接：

【权】 与 【 能】


绝对有必要清楚的认知两者的分别和作用。

两者绝对不相等，搞错了搞混了，麻烦就可以很大。

【权】仅是人为的逻辑性存在的。 只有人为的承认和维护它，它才存在。它人为的存在也可以人为的消逝，或者人为的被改变（增/减/扩/缩）。

决定的人为因素通常包括：法律；宗教；信念；政治理论；学术理论。。等等。 皆为人为因素。

【 能】必须是实体的；实践性；物理性的存在的。必须有实际的效果。而非理论性；逻辑性；或凭空想像的。空谈不能包括在这里 面。

例如老虎有能力吃掉你。但它未必有权这样做。
老虎吃你的时候，你有权自卫。但是你未必有能力做到。

因为【权】是人为存在的，老虎它当然就是不懂，它不懂得人为的东西嘛。
老虎它有的是【 能】而，你知道你有自卫【权】，因为你被人为的教育了，你知道其他人会承认/支持你的自卫【权】。

如果老虎被你关在笼子里面了。你可能会要把它送到餐桌上尝一尝，你可能有这个【能】力。但是，你未必有【权】这样做。你可以争议自己有【权】，但是这要看地方的法律。各地方的法律不相同，这完全是人为的因素。这不影响你的【能】力。你有本事把虎烹吃了，不管法律是否允许。你本事大些，执法的人不知道你把虎烹吃了。你本事再大些，执法 的人即使知道你把虎烹吃了也告不了你。你本事再更大些，你把法律改了！

这就是你自己的【 能】的分别。只有实践性的【能】力，才能改变人为的【权】。空谈无用。


【权】是人为的所有可以争论不休，没完没了。人的看法无法一致，这问题当然没完没了。

【 能】的实践性就很直接了当。马上实践证明就完了。到底是老虎吃你还是你吃它，很快就有答案。老虎饿了吃你，5分 钟下肚子，几小时後消化拉屎。你就变成虎粪了。活不回来了。跟理论分别巨大。你把老虎烹吃了可能1或2小时 。同样会消化拉屎。煮不卫生的话，你拉肚子。老虎吃你多数不拉肚子。因为它的适应消化能力和你 不同。这是【 能】的分别。

吃下去就么有什么子争论啦。

uy..

Thais vs Singaporeans

Cut & Pasted from Sammyboy.com forum - my own message.

Re: Yingluck Shinawatra wins by a landslide as Abhisit conceded defeat

The vote is only a poll.

It is not final - as far as Thais are concerned especially.

There are many possibilities depending on weather the other camp accept this result or not:

• They may go to court citing frauds and cheating. Demand to void this result.
• They may find fault with legitimacy of candidate Yingluck & the party.
• They may initiate a military coupe against this poll out come.
• They may initiate a Yellow Shirt Campaign to oust Yingluck.

None of the above is new, they had all happened before.

Very narrow and limited minds of Singaporeans may not be able to cope with the such reality like Thailand. Which is sad for Singaporeans not the Thais.

I can safely state that even if Abhisit won this poll, his position isn't final unless Red Shirt gave up. They did it before, they can do again, any time, deaths isn't stopping them.

This is what I call vigour & persistent political spirit. Defiance against arbitrary (alien) un-native system and political culture - aka election system. This is something that Thai people are respectable about.

They don't blindly follow rules and system, especially western (foreign) political culture. They know their own interest, and they won't compromise their interest, just to respect a foreign system. Their own historic political system is feudalism dynasty, they love their king - but this is beside the point.

The point is, and on the contrary to Thais in SG, our peasants will blindly follow any system imposed on them, weather it is from LEEgime or remained from previous colonial masters. Unlike Singaporeans, Thais gives priority to their own interest and own tradition, and most importantly - own NEEDS, the Election System (foreign political tradition) is secondary (and experimental) to them. They will try to conduct election and see if that can solve their problems or not, if it does not, they will retract back to their own traditional ways.

On the other hand, Singaporeans just constantly seek rules to follow, and without rules, Singaporeans are at total lost! And they start to complain that "OMG! There is no rule, no system!" If LEEgime did not impose a system to rule them in certain aspects, they will comply with any foreign system or rule especially Western - BLINDLY! Even when they had made themselves total suckers, they will still suck on, happily feeling satisfied and secure - sucking.